--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> 
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Translation of Barry's post:
> > > > 
> > > > "I'm too intellectually lazy to bother not to
> > > > contradict myself, so when I get caught at it,
> > > > I'll just declare that consistency is an
> > > > intellectual limitation."
> > > > 
> > > > Barry, nobody is fooled by this.  *You* wouldn't
> > > > be fooled by it if somebody else tried to use
> > > > it as an excuse for sloppy thinking.  You would
> > > > point out (and have pointed out) that the
> > > > contradictions simply meant the person hadn't
> > > > thought things through, or was trying to play
> > > > both ends against the middle.
> > > 
> > > That's your whole problem in a nutshell, Judy.
> > > 
> > > You honestly believe that you can think this
> > > stuff through.
> > 
> > Think through *what you're saying about* this
> > stuff (whatever it may be), dickhead.
> 
> Ah...when in doubt, revert to the old maid
> repressed sexuality fantasies again.

Translation:  "Gee, I really thought I'd be able
to sneak through my deliberate misreading of what
she said, but she caught me *again*.  What to do?
I know, I'll reiterate my sexual fantasies about
her.  That always makes me look brave and macho."


Reply via email to