--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> >  
> > > I wonder if anyone has ever tried to get the CIA reports on 
> > Mahesh  
> > > via the Freedom of Information Act? That would be interesting 
to 
> > see.
> > >
> > Interesting point- Prompted by your remark, I was searching both 
the 
> > Department of State and CIA websites just now for references to 
TM, 
> > Maharishi, and the Dalai Lama. Not much on TM- A couple of 
> > references on the State Dept. website regarding relgious freedom 
in 
> > Austria and the Netherlands. 
> > 
> > Regarding the Dalai Lama:
> > From Questions Pertaining to Tibet (1969-1972)--
> > http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/70146.pdf
> > 
> > "During the first Nixon administration (1969–1972), the U.S. 
> > Government continued its decade-long support of the Dalai Lama 
and 
> > his followers, including political action, propaganda, and 
> > paramilitary activity... 
> > 
> > Funds also were provided to the Dalai Lama for his propaganda 
> > efforts ...This operation began during the second Eisenhower 
> > administration(1957–1961) and continued through the Kennedy and 
> > Johnson administrations...
> > 
> > The total cost of the Tibetan program ...was approximately $2.5 
> > million per year with $500,000 of that figure for non-guerrilla 
> > political, propaganda, and intelligence operations.
> > 
> > ...CIA Tibetan activities, utilizing followers of the Dalai 
Lama, 
> > have included in addition to guerrilla support a program of 
> > political, propaganda, and intelligence operations."
> > 
> > Interesting that Maharishi claims the CIA opposes him, but for 
> > Tibetan Buddhists, the CIA was an ally.
> >
> 
> Enemy of my enemy... Playing them off against China. And China is 
STILL an enemy, 
> according to the neocons. The most important long-term reason to 
invade Iraq was to 
> create military bases  there in order to have a friendly place to 
position American troops in 
> order to bring pressure to bear on China, or so the PNAC white 
paper, signed off by 
> everybody who was anybody in the first BW administration, says, 
including Brother Jeb.
>
I heard oil control as well to China, Europe and Japan.

Reply via email to