--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "larry.potter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" <llundrub@> > wrote: > > > > I don't give a shit about all the objective stuff. I am not > interested in > > Movement yagyas because ostensibly since the Veda is expressed in > Shakas > > therefore the Movement cannot own those families. I am just > curious how > > yagyas work. > > "technology of the reverberations" for what it's worth is how it > works , you need an expert on the field to answer your question. > > "technology of the reverberations of the Unified Field of Natural > Law ... " > > that's mmy definition, i don't like the word "technology" here, i > think this is where the marketing part of it starts. > > my 0.2
Clarke's Law: Any sufficiently advanced technology will be indistinguishable from magic. My Correlary (though others use it also after I foolishly repeated it in front of 500 sf/ fantasy writers at the World Fantasy Convention about 20+ years ago): Any sufficiently advanced magic will be indistinguishable from technology.
