No this will clear it up once and for all. You can't live without her, so you might as well be sweet and make good lovin. That's the settled issue.
----- Original Message ----- From: "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 10:12 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is enlightenment sexist? > Borat definitively settled this question with his cultural wisdom from > Kazakhstan's laws of nature. > > "We say in Kazakhstan, "You find me woman with brain, I find you a > horse with...Wings."" > > He also has quoted scientific research done in his country proving > that a woman's brain is smaller than a mans. > > I hope this clears this issue up once and for all. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" <llundrub@> wrote: >> > >> > Fuck Lenz RIP, no offense intended but he was less than >> > a nobody because he just baffled you fuckers with bullshit >> > which none of you can get out of your mind as if that >> > illusion made some bit of difference. >> >> Not had your coffee yet today, Llun? :-) >> >> I *get* it. You don't like the guy, having heard stories >> about him you didn't like. Some of those stories are true, >> and even if all of them were true, he still offered some >> very real knowledge and experiences to those who studied >> with him. Me, I'm comfortable with regarding him as a >> guy with problems who nonetheless taught me some useful >> things about spiritual development. I feel the same way >> about Maharishi. >> >> > Women reach enlightenment instantaneously just as do men... >> >> But *far* fewer women realize enlightenment than men. >> That has been true in every era, and still seems to >> be true today. I think the Rama guy had a clue or two >> as to why that is. >> >> > ...you must name your enlightenment first to find the >> > lineage where women still reign and there are plenty, >> > in India. >> >> "Where women reign" is not the issue. Where a large >> number of the women *students* realize their enlight- >> enment is. Name one tradition where that is true. >> I'll wait. >> >> > Whole cults centered around the supremacy of the >> > female, and if any of you spent a day at Shakti Sadana >> > you would meet plenty of enlightened women. >> >> *I* would not be so foolish as to meet someone and >> consider them enlightened, without, say, meditating >> with them quite a few times, in different situations >> and environments. If you have lower standards, you >> can consider as many people enlightened as you want. >> >> > So screw this lecture. It's as lame as Lenz. And as >> > dead an issue. >> >> The guy's daid all right. So will you be, and much >> sooner than you'd like. So it goes... :-) >> >> Remember back to when you almost stormed off this >> group in a huff because Jim was doing a troll thang >> about Tibetan Buddhism? At that time you were all >> self-righteous posturing about how lowvibe it was >> to rank on some study you'd never undertaken >> personally and didn't understand. What has changed >> in the last few weeks since then that enables you >> to rank on someone you never met or studied with, >> eh? :-) >> >> Hint: you just woke up needing to rant, and the >> mention of someone you don't like gave you that >> opportunity. Unlike you (in your previous rants >> following Jim's posts), I'm not going to take >> either your likes and dislikes or your rants >> personally and threaten to storm off the group. >> What you think of the Rama guy doesn't really >> affect me one way or another. I have enough >> on my plate just figuring out what *I* think >> of him. :-) >> > > > > > To subscribe, send a message to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Or go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > and click 'Join This Group!' > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
