--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" > > <willytex@> wrote: > > > > > > TurquoiseB wrote: > > > > Judy Stein on "anti-TMers": > > > > * They are all untrustworthy, without credibility. > > > > * They all lie. > > > > * They have concealed motives. > > > > * They intend to do harm to peace-loving TMers. > > > > * I am right about them, no matter what they say. > > > > * You should agree with me *because* I am right. > > > > * They are bad people. > > > > * They deserve retribution, and soon. > > > > > > > > Judy Stein on Republicans: > > > > * They are all untrustworthy, without credibility. > > > > * They all lie. > > > > * They have concealed motives. > > > > * They intend to do harm to peace-loving Democrats. > > > > * I am right about them, no matter what they say. > > > > * You should agree with me *because* I am right. > > > > * They are bad people. > > > > * They deserve retribution, and soon. > > > > > > > > Coincidence, or indication of state of attention? > > > > > > Uncle - You forgot to mention Judy's suggestion on Usenet > > > that the entire Bush administration should be shot. > > > > Yeah, but that was back then; these days I'm sure > > that she'd opt for lethal injection. > > Here's what I actually said, a little over two > years ago: > > "The entire administration should be thrown in > jail, if not put before a firing squad." > > (For semantics aficionados, the implication of "if > not" here is a little ambiguous; what I meant to > suggest was that they might *deserve* to be put > before a firing squad, but that such a punishment > was too extreme.)
Cool. As long as you're into semantics today, could you clear up these two quotes of yours for us as well? "Folks who abandon their animals should be shot, BTW." "I shoot the messenger when the messenger deserves to be shot." :-)
