Kenny... I totally agree.  Since the five post limit I have been able
to read and ENJOY most of the posts.  Not the case before the limit. 

I also want to say... working in the service industry for many years,
I have come to realize that no matter what a person does it will not
satisfy everyone. And usually the ones that you make the most
accommodations for not only don't appreciate it but will continue to
ask for more.

Please keep the five post limit.. as is.  It seems to be working fine.

Again.. primarily a lurker but also an avid reader.

Thanks

HandsOnMaui


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Kenny H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For what little my opinion will be worth, and I'm mainly a lurker, I
> have really enjoyed reading FF Life again since the 5 post limit came
> into being. It is much more manageable, the tone is much more civil,
> and there is not a lot of one liner posts and the people who felt a
> need to post about anything and everything either have left the group
> of they have learned to post less.
> 
> I vote to keep it like this, with the five posts.
> 
> Kenny H.
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote:
> >
> > The trouble with this idea is that, as you said, counting is
> difficult. But
> > if people really wanted me to, I'd be willing to average posts over
> a week,
> > and start the recount each Monday morning. Let's have feedback on
> that idea.
> > An alternative would be for you to do all your writing in your email
> program
> > or in 5 long emails which you save as drafts until you've done all the
> > writing you want to do and can send them. Of course, that prevents the
> > liveliness of back and forth dialog, and might discourage
readership, as
> > many people wouldn't want to read big long things, unless they were
> > extremely well written. I used to notice that FFL became more
active on
> > weekends, especially Sundays, as people have more time to
> participate. So
> > again, I'm open to the idea of a 35-post weekly limit for each
> member. Let's
> > get some feedback on that.
> >
>


Reply via email to