--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By now, every participant of FFL sees that once the 5 post a day rule > was temporarily lifted that a wave of posting and expression was > visited upon us. > > Forget the 5 post a day rule; forget the 35 post a week rule. > > Let's get back to the way it was. Yes, the price that we may have to > pay is that spairaig may come back to his 50 one-line posts a day but > all you have to do is invest the 3 seconds it will take you to skim > over his name in the message list and you're done! > > Of course, you'll want to read every single one of MY 50 posts a day > and you'll want to hang on every word that I write. > > I'm precious.
When Rick put you on moderated status because you refused to abide by the new rule, I found it annoying to have to keep track of how many posts per day to approve. And, I fully intend to leave it up to Rick to count and keep track of people's weekly post counts. Personally, I would rather there were no posting limit, simply because enforcing it is a nuisance. But, if there is going to be a limit, it would be my preference that willful violators be given one warning, and then booted from FFL if they continue to break the rule.
