--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > TurquoiseB wrote: > > Bingo. What you focus on, you become. > > From: Judy Stein > Subject: Re: Good bye > Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental > Date: 2003-11-07 07:00:34 PST > http://tinyurl.com/ynv9bn > > Barry sent this post to me via email to make sure I > wouldn't miss it. I responded briefly and politely, > only to find that he had configured his account to > block email from my address. That pretty much takes > the cake for chickenshittery, in my book.
LOL. T'would seem that my post yesterday about trolls has the resident troll here working overtime. :-) This particular tempest in a pisspot was resolved long ago. Judy stormed off of a.m.t. in a snit, so upset about Shemp's beliefs after years of TM that she expressed doubts about TM's overall effectiveness. I actually believed that she had done what she said, and left a.m.t., so I posted a note to the group and copied her on it in email suggesting that she might find some answers to her announced dilemma in Tibetan Buddhism, because of its emphasis on compassion. If you're silly enough to follow the tinyurl link above, Judy's "I'm leaving" post is #28. My reply, which is the one she refers to as "chickenshittery," is #29. As for her claim of "chickenshittery," that email account was blocked to ALL traffic. I used it *only* to post to a.m.t. and other such spamtraps on Google. As it turns out, Judy knew that, and had already made at least one post some time earlier acknowledging that she knew it. So this was Just Another Opportunity To Feign Indignation. This is documented in post #36. Her gracious apology is in post #37. She stayed "gone" from a.m.t. for less than 24 hours. And now, back to the ongoing attempts by the Troll >From Texas to start more arguments. As I suggested yesterday, he's probably lonely, and this is what he *does* when he's lonely. Personally I think that masturbating would be more effective, but that's probably just me. And if Judy chooses to respond to this by trying to reopen the old argument, I might suggest the same practice to her. :-)
