--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mathatbrahman" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ---That's why Brahman is a paradox. Can't be fit into "either - or".

The thing about Brahman, as Ken Wilber points
out, is that It is "One without a second," One
without an opposite. If you say It is X, that
means It is not not-X, which gives not-X an
existence independent of Brahman; it gives
Brahman an opposite, a second.

>  In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Judy: "First you say the Absolute can be found only by the mind
> > > ceasing to exist; then you say when the mind ceases to exist at 
> the
> > > end of the mantra trail, there can be no finding of the 
> Absolute.  
> > > Huh??"
> > > 
> > > Edg: Let the poetry begin.  Shotgun time.  Hopefully a pellet 
or 
> two
> > > will hit the target.
> > 
> > Nope, sorry, not this target.
> > 
> > Can the Absolute be found only by the mind ceasing
> > to exist?
> > 
> > Or can there be no finding of the Absolute when
> > the mind ceases to exist?
> > 
> > (See quote above.)
> > 
> > <snip>
> > > Judy:   Let me ask you something, though. Where do you (if you 
> do) 
> > > fit Brahman into your scheme?
> > > 
> > > Edg:  I hold that the word Brahman is best used as a synonym for
> > > the Absolute.
> > 
> > Here's Nagarjuna's Four Negations:
> > 
> > Brahman is not the relative. 
> > Brahman is not the Absolute. 
> > Brahman is not the relative and the Absolute. 
> > Brahman is not neither the relative nor the Absolute.
> > 
> > Each of these negations was the conclusion of
> > a rigorous logical process, each responding to a
> > question: "Is Brahman the relative?" "Is Brahman
> > the Absolute?" "Is Brahman the relative and the
> > Absolute?" "Is Brahman neither the relative nor
> > the Absolute?"
> > 
> > That's the Advaita take on Brahman, in other
> > words--no matter what you say about It, you're
> > wrong.
> > 
> > From what I can painfully glean from your
> > exchanges with Barry, and your response just
> > now, you think Brahman is the Absolute, and
> > Barry thinks Brahman is both Absolute and
> > relative.
> >
>


Reply via email to