--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" 
<shempmcgurk@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" 
> > <shempmcgurk@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _Alarmist  global warming claims melt under scientific 
> > > > scrutiny :: 
> > > > > > CHICAGO 
> > > > > > > SUN-TIMES ::  Other Views_ 
> > > > > > > (http://www.suntimes.com/news/otherviews/450392,CST-EDT-
> > > > > > REF30b.article)  
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I already posted a link to this article.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Judy's response?  It's totally meaningless because 
> > ExxonMobile 
> > > > funds 
> > > > > > the institute where the author works.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Heartland Institute has received $791,500 from ExxonMobil 
since 
> > > > 1998.
> > > >
> > > > The Heartland Institute created a website in the Spring of 
2007,
> > > > www.globalwarmingheartland.org, which asserts there is no 
> > scientific
> > > > consensus on global warming and features a list of experts 
and a
> > > list
> > > > of like-minded think tanks, many of whom have received 
funding 
> > from
> > > > ExxonMobil and other polluters. [...]
> > > >
> > > > Walter F. Buchholtz, an ExxonMobil executive, serves as 
> > Heartland's
> > > > Government Relations Advisor, according to Heartland's 2005 
IRS 
> > Form
> > > > 990, pg. 15.
> > > > http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2005/363/309/2005-
363309812-
> > > 0295fbb2-9.pdf
> > > >
> > > > The Heartland Institute formerly sponsored and hosted
> > > > www.climatesearch.org, a web page ostensibly dedicated to 
> > objective
> > > > research on global warming, but at the same time presenting 
> > heavily
> > > > biased research by organizations such as the American 
Petroleum
> > > > Institute as an FAQ section.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=41
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > SO WHAT?
> > > > 
> > > > Did you read the article?  It was, mostly, a compendium of 
> > references 
> > > > to published articles in the leading scientific journals that 
> > refuted 
> > > > the global warming position.
> > > > 
> > > > Are all these journals and all the authors of those pieces 
ALSO 
> > in 
> > > > the pocket of ExxonMobile?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Cherry picking isolated stories to promote one's biased claims 
pales
> > > in comparison to the overwhelming massive collective evidence
> > > indicating the reality of global warming.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > There IS NO "overwhelming massive collective evidence indicating 
the 
> > reality of global warming".
> > 
> > That's just something Al Gore said or that you read in the media.
> 
> 
> The fact that you are astonishingly uninformed is your fault, not 
mine.





Well, then, it should be easy enough for you to actually SHOW ME 
where this alleged "overwhelming massive collective evidence 
indicating the reality of global warming" is.

And please don't reference where someone is SAYING that it is so but 
provide the actual evidence, as you claim.

I'm waiting.







> 
> 
> > > The fact that the author of
> > > the article works for a known paid Big Oil shill makes your case
> > > laughable when you expect to be taken seriously.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to