--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --Right, but TALKING (or posting stuff on the internet) about
> Enlightenment is another "story". The Neo-Advaitins are saying their
> story is superior to the stories of others.
> Buddhism has an absolute continuum of existence, and doesn't get
> into such infantile games.
Are you saying Rory is a Neo-Advaitin and that he claims his story is
superior to other stories?
> - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <rorygoff@>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Sure doesn't sound *anything* like moodmaking to me. :-)
> > > >
> > > > No doubt :-) But then, you still think enlightenment is an
> > > > experience
> > >
> > > No, not in the same way that eating an orange is an
> > > experience, but one's *stories* about enlightement
> > > and one's *interpretation* of enlightenment are
> > > *very much* experiences, and *very much* stories.
> >
> > Dual attention and the duality of language can never contain the
> > wholeness of nondual awareness. Words and stories will never be more
> > than the crudest of descriptions of that which is known on the level
> > of unbounded pure awareness.
> >
>
