--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nablus108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" 
> > <steve.sundur@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > >Lurk,
> > > I missed Cliff Rees (not spelled Reese?)  posting here?  He 
was 
> a 
> > very
> > >  interesting movement guy if it was the same guy I knew.  What 
> > posts
> > >  can you direct me to?  I would like to read his perspective 
on 
> his
> > >  movement life if he posted it.
> > > 
> > > Cliff was well traveled, and had the opportunity to rise into 
> the 
> > > higher echelons of TMO because of his business dealings.  So, 
he 
> > > always had plenty of good stories to share in this regard.  
His 
> > handle 
> > > was Cliffthedancer, and as well, he always had some fun 
stories 
> to 
> > > share about his personal life.  He also served well as a 
reality 
> > > check, and could come down hard on either side of the divide, 
> > > political or otherwise.  Perhaps it was in this regard that he 
> ran 
> > > into interference with Judy.  
> > > 
> > > I think some the frustration with Judy is that many come to 
FFL 
> > for 
> > > some easy banter, interesting discussion, venting, and Judy 
> comes 
> > with 
> > > her game face on.  Not to say that Judy can't show a lighter 
> side, 
> > > (she does have a good dry sense of humor IMO), but the 
> discussion 
> > can 
> > > pretty quickly ramp up to a level that squeezes out the fun.
> > > 
> > > lurk
> > > 
> > What she has to offer is well known-- if someone doesn't want to 
> > play, all they have to do is respond with silence. I've never 
seen 
> > her hound someone into responding.:-)
> 
> If someone can't stand her piercing intellect so be it. I enjoy 
her 
> tearing inaccurasies to pieces. My vote is for the AMT-gang to 
> retire home, but Judy should stay here.
>
Someone oughta remind folks *who are interested* (and *only* those 
who are interested...) that a piercing intellect is a requirement 
for Enlightenment...Even Byron Katie would agree.:-)

Reply via email to