>   What about racist slurs? Is “trailer-trash”
> permitted but “white, trailer-trash” forbidden? 

“white, trailer-trash” should be forbidden if only for
grammatical reasons.

--- billy jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Rick, clarify this for members:
>    
>   Define "gratuitous profanity" and also help me
> understand "non-gratuitous profanity". I want to be
> able to use non-gratuitous profanity (if I deem it
> important) without you censoring me or initiating an
> administrative reprisal. 
>    
>   What comprises a "sexist slur" since we must
> assume that you have intentionally demarcated it
> from the more usual "profanity" to be able to
> monitor it. 
>    
>   What about racist slurs? Is “trailer-trash”
> permitted but “white, trailer-trash” forbidden?  
>    
>   Is the visually, literal euphemism
> "f*ckhead"(which you have used in your email about
> the new guidelines) an example of an allowed or
> disallowed term? 
>    
>   So … 
>    
>   Don't want to explicitly answer these questions?
> Then you choose to deliberately obscure the horizon
> between permitted and forbidden speech. This can
> only mean that you intend to exercise your edicts
> based upon personal likes and dislikes – whether
> about ideas or persons.
>    
>   Don't like being forced to monitor member's posts
> for content, style and intent? Welcome to the world
> of Stazi informants. You are now the oberstfurher.
> And please don’t give me that …  “I’m light with my
> trigger finger”. You’ve already proved that you are
> easily manipulated by the pathetic sentimentality of
> Bronte and the machinations of New Morning.  
>    
>   So … find the thought of monitoring it all rather
> taxing? Need help to make it all work? Just go
> offline and turn it over to your seconds-in-command,
> your obergruppenfurhers - New Morning for “obvious”
> outrages, Bronte Baxter for “emotionally
> insensitive” offences and Edg for “intuitively
> recognizable” insults. 
>    
>   Oh, and by the way - just so I don’ t leave anyone
> with any “ambiguity”, which is what I believe will
> soon happen regularly: 
>    
>   1.       I believe that you, Rick Archer, have
> made an extremely foolish decision to jeopardize the
> independent speech of FFL members. 
>    
>   2.       I believe that Bronte Baxter is too
> sentimental and cowardly to fight for her own
> points-of-view and has cut a deal (consciously or
> unconsciously) with you to create a special FFL
> privileged status for herself. Such a status would
> allow her to speak without incurring the
> confrontation that the rest of us might reasonably
> incur as a result of firmly stating our point of
> view. Based upon the gender-driven definitions of
> Bronte’s recent emails, and New Morning’s insistence
> that you are not doing your job, which you have
> explicitly sympathized with, you are subjecting the
> rest of us to the secret domination motives of these
> two members. I have noticed that Peter is already
> afraid to use language stronger than “I agree” or “I
> disagree” when replying to Bronte.
>    
>   3.       For years Judy Stein has rationally
> slugged it out with anyone who wants to take her on
> and has endured being called “slut” and “cunt”. You,
> Rick Archer, have never intervened, and for you to
> do so now, generally and without cause, renders
> Judy’s forbearance worthless and the duplicity in
> Baxter and New Morn’s domination strategy especially
> egregious and destructive. 
>    
>   4.       I believe that New Morning has conspired
> to excise the free speech of FFL members. I believe
> this renders her actions nothing less than
> traitorous to the spirit of FFL. I consider her
> efforts not only fundamentally dishonest but a
> blatant attempt to destroy the free-speech integrity
> of this forum. 
>    
>   For you, Rick Archer, to frame these domination
> attempts as “just an exercise” is like the Maoist
> officer declaring the Tiananmen Square massacre as
> “just the end of a democratic experiment”. 
> 
>        
> ---------------------------------
> Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you
> sell. 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Choose the right car based on your needs.  Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car 
Finder tool.
http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/

Reply via email to