John, Yes, grants; that's the plan. But I'm not going to go that one alone. More on that soon.
In the meantime, what is "natural law?" And yes, I believe some species could exist well in the natural order--others not. Depends on what they are designed to do. Jeff --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You should request the National Science Foundation for a grant to > carry on your work. They should be interested in funding your work > since it is related to synthetic life or artificial life. > > A few weeks ago, there was an article in Reuters that other > scientists are developing methods to create life from basic chemical > compounds. These scientists believe that they are in the verge of a > new discovery for creating life. > > This brings us to the next question if this new life can fit in to > the world ecological balance, or natural law. > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jeffrey N Cook" > <jnoelcook@> wrote: > > > > Alex, > > > > Very cool. But honestly, if I had $100, I use it to buy food. > > > > Besides, from my experience, as soon as I'd post anything from that > > microscope people would then jump on the fact that they include > > software to add special effects and the ability to manipulate the > > images. I think this would just complicate things further at his > > point. > > > > But thanks for the link. I added it to my favorites. > > > > Jeff > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jeffrey N Cook" > <jnoelcook@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Well, then how would I film it? > > > > > > Here's a $100 method to film it with a PC at up to 200x > > magnification: > > > > > > http://digiblue.com/digital_blue/qx5.html > > > > > > > Besides, isn't it more eye-opening to be able to see things > > > > occur with the naked eye? I mean, I understand > > > > that you want a closer look, and I will indeed provide that > > > > in time when I somehow aquire the proper film equipment for > > > > that. But isn't this at least a good start and a reasonable > > > > demonstration? > > > > > > Maybe it actually is more impressive literally with the naked > eye. > > As > > > in actually being in the room, seeing the stuff up close with the > > > naked eye. However, the view from the 'net, on YouTube, is far > less > > > impressive. There's no way to determine from those videos that the > > > stuff in the container is a lifeform. > > > > > > > But please, this is great to know what other's are expecting. > I > > didn't > > > > think that would be one. Alright, what else? > > > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > > > > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Use a microscope instead of a videocam. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
