* Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-19 19:29]:
> >
> > -void
> > +int
> > register_percpu_irq (ia64_vector vec, struct irqaction *action)
> > {
>
> Each and every function example in Documentation/CodingStyle has the
> return type on the same line as the function name, so why not get
> these in-line while you are modifying them anyway?
Because all other functions in that file are coded this way. I think
it looks better if you don't change the style in a particular file.
Am I wrong?
> int register_percpu_irq (ia64_vector vec, struct irqaction *action)
>
>
> > @@ -174,6 +175,13 @@ void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, st
> > desc->irqs_unhandled = 0;
> > }
> >
> > +
> > +void set_timer_interrupt(unsigned int irq)
>
> Just one blank line between functions, as pr CodingStyle:
> "In source files, separate functions with one blank line. ..."
Fixed (locally). I'll repost if I get feedback of the contents of the
patch.
Regards,
Bernhard
_______________________________________________
fastboot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot
