On 19/03/07, Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-19 19:29]:
> > >
> > > -void
> > > +int
> > > register_percpu_irq (ia64_vector vec, struct irqaction *action)
> > > {
> >
> > Each and every function example in Documentation/CodingStyle has the
> > return type on the same line as the function name, so why not get
> > these in-line while you are modifying them anyway?
>
> Because all other functions in that file are coded this way. I think
> it looks better if you don't change the style in a particular file.
> Am I wrong?
>
Consistency within the file certainly makes sense.
--
Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
_______________________________________________
fastboot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot
