X-Comment-To: Bart Oldeman
Hi!
13-���-2002 19:30 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> te> rdatclk was linked earlier. now its '#if 0' code (to be deleted ASAP)
>> I seen this, but I don't know (yet) where similar code may be present.
BO> look for initclk.c
See end of my previous letter.
BO> (and for the why? in initdisk.c -- although I prefer b) --
?
BO> because IMHO if the C starts looking like a clumsy form of assembly
BO> language I'd write it in assembly language); this works and it's
BO> initialization code anyway.
But this is (1) not portable and (2) in C initclk.c _really looks_
"like a clumsy form of assembly", whereas (3) in C both source and code are
longer, so I suggest returning to assembler.
Also, yes - initialization code not eats resident space, but it eats
space in executable.
BO> The date should indeed be read twice but the problematic situation would
BO> only very rarely happen, when booting a PC at exactly the right time before
BO> midnight.
Why not prevent this situation at all?
==^^===============================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?b1ddyi.b3hwCs.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===============================================================
