I voted for SafeBoot, but then I'm completely biased. seriously, I could make many claims about how much better it is than its peers, but who would believe me?
Let's start with performance though - most FDE products use propriatary 16bit pre-boot OS's, SafeBoot uses a multi threaded 32bit OS, so naturally it's faster, can access more memory, and do whizzy things like support true color interfaces and 16,000 dynamic users... S. On Jul 24, 12:26 pm, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you voted on that survey > (http://security-basics.blogspot.com/2007/07/re-fde-full-disk-encrypti... > vey-for_18.html), please tell me your reasons. > > I understand, that Seagate FDE.2 Momentus runs out of concurrence because > its hardware, but I don't understand why Secude is this popular. Or why > there is only one product with less counts than Compusec? > > Regarding the performance > (http://www.xml-dev.com/blog/index.php?action=viewtopic > <http://www.xml-dev.com/blog/index.php?action=viewtopic&id=250> &id=250), > Compusec and ProtectDrive seem to be the best. Regarding the price, there is > no other tool than Compusec which is free. > > In my opinion, there is only one disadvantage using Compusec. You have to > specifiy a "Recover Code" only composed of letters and digits. > > So please tell me the criteria that count in your eyes. > > Regards, o.w. > > _______________________________________________ > FDE mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED]://www.xml-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/fde _______________________________________________ FDE mailing list [email protected] http://www.xml-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/fde
