On 24 March 2015 at 01:36, Jens Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Should TSes use the macro spelling pattern > > __cpp_experimental_whatever > > or > > __cpp_whatever > > assuming that the value of the macro will change anyway when a feature > moves from TS land to the standard proper? >
I'd rather that __cpp_experimental_whatever be reserved for library features that are going into namespace std::experimental. A different spelling for experimental language features is fine by me. Nevin :-) -- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:[email protected]> (847) 691-1404
_______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
