On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Nevin Liber <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 24 March 2015 at 01:36, Jens Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Should TSes use the macro spelling pattern >> >> __cpp_experimental_whatever >> >> or >> >> __cpp_whatever >> >> assuming that the value of the macro will change anyway when a feature >> moves from TS land to the standard proper? >> > > I'd rather that __cpp_experimental_whatever be reserved for library > features that are going into namespace std::experimental. > > A different spelling for experimental language features is fine by me. > I would think that std::experimental names should be given __cpp_lib_experimental_* macros, and __cpp_experimental_* should be reserved for experimental language features (if we ever want to include "experimental" in such a feature name).
_______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
