> I’m not sure what, if any, is the process required/desired of such > updates.
As established at the Urbana meeting, the process is that the consensus we need is of SG10, not WG21. My personal preference is that we would do every update from a WG21 document. But I'd also prefer that the published SD-6 not have any glaring errors. The question is whether we have consensus within SG10 which principle should take precedence. > If there is no required process, then the attachment seems better > than P0996R1. Noted, thanks. Clark _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
