> On Feb 23, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Nelson, Clark <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I’m not sure what, if any, is the process required/desired of such >>> updates. >> >> As established at the Urbana meeting, the process is that the consensus we >> need is of SG10, not WG21. > > On that basis, I think it's sufficient for a change to have support on > this mailing list, rather than having been visible to the full > committee in a WG21 document, prior to being incorporated into SD-6 > (with similar amounts of time allowed for objections). > > So, +1 to using the attachment, following Jens' proposal.
+1 — WEB _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
