On 3/11/2016 4:14 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote: > Agustin raised the question of whether there should be a macro to > indicate the presence of the fix for LWG2296. I made a couple of > replies suggesting that, to me, the answer is not obviously "yes". > > So far, no one (not even Agustin) has made any further comment.
I said that if there's no macro I'd prefer to leave the code broken. That should have implied my motivation is weak. I think a macro fits the bill, but if lacks in popularity I'm not going to push for it. Regards, -- Agustín K-ballo Bergé http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
