2016-03-11 20:27 GMT+01:00 Agustín Bergé <[email protected]>: > On 3/11/2016 4:14 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote: >> Agustin raised the question of whether there should be a macro to >> indicate the presence of the fix for LWG2296. I made a couple of >> replies suggesting that, to me, the answer is not obviously "yes". >> >> So far, no one (not even Agustin) has made any further comment. > > I said that if there's no macro I'd prefer to leave the code broken. > That should have implied my motivation is weak. I think a macro fits the > bill, but if lacks in popularity I'm not going to push for it.
I tentatively agree, I see no need for a feature macro here. - Daniel _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
