> All the variant changes from Oulu should be covered by > __has_include(<variant>); I don't think we have a need to track them > separately unless someone chooses to produce a <variant> header that > doesn't match the contents of any working draft.
I note that you don't mention the changes to "any" or "optional". Should I infer that you think those changes deserve a macro, even though the previous state appeared in only one WD? Clark _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
