On 22 July 2016 at 01:48, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Nelson, Clark <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > All the variant changes from Oulu should be covered by >> > __has_include(<variant>); I don't think we have a need to track them >> > separately unless someone chooses to produce a <variant> header that >> > doesn't match the contents of any working draft. >> >> I note that you don't mention the changes to "any" or "optional". Should I >> infer that you think those changes deserve a macro, even though the >> previous state appeared in only one WD? > > > I'd be happy not adding a macro for those either if no-one has shipped the > previous version yet. (And if they already have, I think we'd need to > discuss this, but it's still probably also appropriate to not add a macro.) > > I agree. FWIW we haven't shipped those types in namespace std yet but when we do it'll be the ones from the CD, not the pre-Oulu versions.
_______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
