I'm getting ready to take silence as assent: that the document is ready to be published as SD-6, and that no one minds if SD-6 differs from P0096R5 in the pre-Albuquerque mailing by (effectively) deleting the editor-notes.
Clark > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:features-bounces@open- > std.org] On Behalf Of Nelson, Clark > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 10:41 > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17? > > I have posted another revision: > > http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21albuquerque/SG10/sd-6.html > > The only technical changes have to do with P0135R1, but I have also > updated the section references from the C++17 table (and reordered a > few things to better match the revised section order). > > > I have been assuming that, in the revision of SD-6, the display of > editor-notes (at this point consisting almost entirely of indications > of missing examples) would be disabled by the style sheet. > > But I'm somewhat inclined to leave them enabled in the revision in > the pre-Albuquerque mailing (i.e. the one that EWG and LEWG will be > considering); IOW to tweak the style sheet after the content is > captured in the mailing. > > If you would be concerned about that course of action, please let me > know. > > Clark > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Spicer [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 12:58 > > To: Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]> > > Cc: Nelson, Clark <[email protected]>; [email protected] > > std.org <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17? > > > > Me too. > > > > John. > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > > > > > On 29 September 2017 at 01:12, Nelson, Clark > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > The pre-Albuquerque mailing is only about two weeks away, > > so I'd better stop sitting on this. Please see: > > > > http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21albuquerque/SG10/sd-6.html > > <http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21albuquerque/SG10/sd-6.html> > > > > My hope is to publish this as P0096R5 in the mailing, and > > then update SD-6 from that, preferably before the meeting (assuming > I > > hear no objections). > > > > As always, the change indications are relative to the > > published SD-6. To make it easier to review recent technical > changes, > > the relevant papers are listed below. > > > > There's one issue I'd like to specifically point out. For > > the new features added to the filesystem library, Jonathan > suggested > > updating the value of __cpp_lib_filesystem to 201703. In what I > have > > right now, two out of those three features are indicated by a value > > of 201606, just because that's the actual date of their adoption, > and > > only the third is 201703. If there is a consensus that they should > > all be lumped together under a single value, I'll change it, but so > > far there has been only one comment by one person. (And later it > > would be easier for me to erase the distinction than to restore > it.) > > > > Would anyone have any issues with this as a new revision > > of SD-6? > > > > Clark > > > > N4230 > > N4366 > > N4387 > > N4510 > > P0024 > > P0028 > > P0032 > > P0040 > > P0074 > > P0127 > > P0220 > > P0254 > > P0283 > > P0295 > > P0307 > > P0336 > > P0371 > > P0386 > > P0394 > > P0618 > > Transactional Memory > > _______________________________________________ > > Features mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected] > > std.org> > > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features > > <http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Features mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected] > > std.org> > > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Features mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
