On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Nelson, Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm getting ready to take silence as assent: that the document is ready to be > published as SD-6, and that no one minds if SD-6 differs from P0096R5 in the > pre-Albuquerque mailing by (effectively) deleting the editor-notes.
I'm okay with this, thank you Clark! ~Aaron > > Clark > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:features-bounces@open- >> std.org] On Behalf Of Nelson, Clark >> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 10:41 >> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17? >> >> I have posted another revision: >> >> http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21albuquerque/SG10/sd-6.html >> >> The only technical changes have to do with P0135R1, but I have also >> updated the section references from the C++17 table (and reordered a >> few things to better match the revised section order). >> >> >> I have been assuming that, in the revision of SD-6, the display of >> editor-notes (at this point consisting almost entirely of indications >> of missing examples) would be disabled by the style sheet. >> >> But I'm somewhat inclined to leave them enabled in the revision in >> the pre-Albuquerque mailing (i.e. the one that EWG and LEWG will be >> considering); IOW to tweak the style sheet after the content is >> captured in the mailing. >> >> If you would be concerned about that course of action, please let me >> know. >> >> Clark >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: John Spicer [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 12:58 >> > To: Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]> >> > Cc: Nelson, Clark <[email protected]>; [email protected] >> > std.org <[email protected]> >> > Subject: Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17? >> > >> > Me too. >> > >> > John. >> > >> > >> > On Oct 2, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: >> > >> > Looks good to me. >> > >> > >> > >> > On 29 September 2017 at 01:12, Nelson, Clark >> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > The pre-Albuquerque mailing is only about two weeks away, >> > so I'd better stop sitting on this. Please see: >> > >> > http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21albuquerque/SG10/sd-6.html >> > <http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21albuquerque/SG10/sd-6.html> >> > >> > My hope is to publish this as P0096R5 in the mailing, and >> > then update SD-6 from that, preferably before the meeting (assuming >> I >> > hear no objections). >> > >> > As always, the change indications are relative to the >> > published SD-6. To make it easier to review recent technical >> changes, >> > the relevant papers are listed below. >> > >> > There's one issue I'd like to specifically point out. For >> > the new features added to the filesystem library, Jonathan >> suggested >> > updating the value of __cpp_lib_filesystem to 201703. In what I >> have >> > right now, two out of those three features are indicated by a value >> > of 201606, just because that's the actual date of their adoption, >> and >> > only the third is 201703. If there is a consensus that they should >> > all be lumped together under a single value, I'll change it, but so >> > far there has been only one comment by one person. (And later it >> > would be easier for me to erase the distinction than to restore >> it.) >> > >> > Would anyone have any issues with this as a new revision >> > of SD-6? >> > >> > Clark >> > >> > N4230 >> > N4366 >> > N4387 >> > N4510 >> > P0024 >> > P0028 >> > P0032 >> > P0040 >> > P0074 >> > P0127 >> > P0220 >> > P0254 >> > P0283 >> > P0295 >> > P0307 >> > P0336 >> > P0371 >> > P0386 >> > P0394 >> > P0618 >> > Transactional Memory >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Features mailing list >> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected] >> > std.org> >> > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features >> > <http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features> >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Features mailing list >> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected] >> > std.org> >> > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Features mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features > _______________________________________________ > Features mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
