Hi Jeroen, we have revisor on F-9 ignoring the requested arch and building the spin based on the host arch only - is this a known issue? The revisor-made spin we have doesn't work on i586 :-/
more details below... On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Martin Langhoff <martin.langh...@gmail.com> wrote: > the olpc XS spin is hitting a problem installing on i586s (and that > includes our own XO). The problem seems to be well known -- anaconda > composes based on the arch of the build host rather than on the arch > requested, as described in: > > https://fedorahosted.org/revisor/wiki/AnacondaUpdates#TheUnabletoInstalloni586Example2 > > The revisor conf says "architecture=386", yet we are getting _only_ > openssl i686 on the iso, which won't get installed on 586, so > everything breaks on the (partially installed) machine. > I'm away from my buildbox today -- Jerry's been testing and reports > that pungi-driven composes also put an openssl-i386 on the iso, while > revisor-driven composes don't. So it sounds like the problem is > perhaps in how revisor drives anaconda? > > Any hints or ideas? It seems to be a well known problem...? > > (the compose host is a Fedora-9 box, that follows updates.newkey) cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list