2009/7/30 <wde...@mikrotec.com> > Is Fedora really gaining that much ground with every bi-yearly release to > justify that pace?
Regular release are pretty much a requirement for providing large numbers or large scale updates. Providing some of these large scale updates just arent practical without breaking an existing release and waiting a year or two to launch major updates kind of goes against the spirit of "leading edge" that Fedora is well known for. > After all Red Hat is not a desktop but a server, right? Fedora is not Red Hat. Red Hat releases are based heavily on Fedora and a lot of Fedoras infrastructure resources come from Red Hat. tThat is where the link ends. > And Chrome could kill current races to find a desktop to compete with Windows. That just aint gonna happen. > So why not concentrate on what Red Hat/Fedora does best? But regular leading edge releases of open source Linux _is_ what Fedora does best. > Let Ubuntu grind out Gnome and KDE enhancements. Open Source is about choice. Sure Ubuntu can grind those things out. I on the other hand think Fedora does it better. > How often does Solaris release desktop distros? Solaris has very different aims. -- There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and those who don't... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
