Jindrich Novy wrote: > Nope, it is intentional. It is needed to somehow distinguish the > noarch and arch-dependent part. So package texlive-csplain contains > the noarch bits and texlive-csplain.ARCH ships the binaries.
Wouldn't texlive-csplain-libs or texlive-csplain-bin be more compliant to
our guidelines?
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
