Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #7 from Qianqian Fang <fan...@gmail.com> 2009-03-27 10:18:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Some feedback (but I'm *not* a CJK user so my opinion does not count much) : > > 1. our current practice is to forbid CJK fontconfig rules bellow 65. The > current package violates this by putting stuff at 61 As I said, because 65-non-latin is extremely outdated, and no one try to chance this situation, plus that you told me it is not good to use prepend_first in the fontconfig files, then, the only way to by-pass the default font rendering order is to use a lower number. That's why I named 85-wqy-bitmapfont.conf to 61-wqy-bitmapfont.conf. It is really 65-non-latin should be fixed, not wqy-bitmap-fonts. > 2. IMHO the fontconfig rules in a package should never declare rules for fonts > not included in this package. So I'd dump all the rules not dealing with > "WenQuanYi Bitmap Song". If someone wants "AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni" rules he can > ask to have them added to the Fedora package that ships "AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni" > (if any) same as above. > > 3. IMHO it's also bad practice to declare a font in several generic families > choose serif, sans-serif or monospace but not all of them because wqy-bitmap-fonts is not monospaced. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list