Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Warren Togami <wtog...@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fan...@gmail.com) --- Comment #8 from Warren Togami <wtog...@redhat.com> 2009-03-27 10:29:06 EDT --- Do statements like "quality is not impressive" have agreement from our Japanese developers? This might very well be true, but we need to avoid the appearance of cultural favoritism. > First, pango can not tell if "日本語" are Japanese Kanji or Chinese Hanzi, while > PANGU_LANGUAGE is not defined under non-CJK language, so, pango will not mark > the character with the proper language tags, and some CJK specific fontconfig > rules will be bypassed. What is the purpose of CJK specific fontconfig rules, and why is it necessary for CJK to behave differently than non-CJK when dealing with CJK-glyphs? Do C, J and K fontconfig rules differ from each other? > 2. update 65-non-latin.conf. it is too old and only makes more troubles if it > stay the way it is. What do you suggest for this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
