Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510


Warren Togami <wtog...@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(fan...@gmail.com)




--- Comment #8 from Warren Togami <wtog...@redhat.com>  2009-03-27 10:29:06 EDT 
---
Do statements like "quality is not impressive" have agreement from our Japanese
developers?  This might very well be true, but we need to avoid the appearance
of cultural favoritism.

> First, pango can not tell if "日本語" are Japanese Kanji or Chinese Hanzi, while
> PANGU_LANGUAGE is not defined under non-CJK language, so, pango will not mark
> the character with the proper language tags, and some CJK specific fontconfig
> rules will be bypassed.

What is the purpose of CJK specific fontconfig rules, and why is it necessary
for CJK to behave differently than non-CJK when dealing with CJK-glyphs?

Do C, J and K fontconfig rules differ from each other?

> 2. update 65-non-latin.conf. it is too old and only makes more troubles if it
> stay the way it is. 

What do you suggest for this?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

Reply via email to