Douglas McClendon wrote: > Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: >> Just curious; I like what I'm reading, although I do not follow some >> parts of the theoretical workarounds, but: Is there any particular use >> case for all of this? I'm asking, because the only thing I can think >> of, it's all this work being done to prevent a user's >> "5-min-avg-uptime" desktop from having to reboot after install from a >> live disc. > > More specifically, as par my other reply- > > One possible implementation of USB-flash persistance involves the same > mechanisms vis-a-vis- > > You might want to make the snapshot overlay device begin its life as a > broken > mirror or extra-dm-layer device, so that the user may _optionally_ at > some point > during the life-cycle of the boot session, choose to live-migrate their > system > changes to a usb-flash device. >
Nice one! This use-case I recognise. I think, technically, the same techniques could be used, and this is the make-my-system-live feature we (Revisor) want. Great idea! Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -kanarip -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list Fedora-livecd-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list