Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-01-11 22:33:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > I'm using Fedora 10, which has Epiphany 2.24. So I used > > > > %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/extensions/gget* > > > > Is that ok? > > No. It would be ok if you followed the 'no duplicate directory ownership' > rule, > but in this case we cannot use it, because it will leave unowned dirs behind. > It's better if two packages own the a dir than no package. > > So you should use > %{_libdir}/epiphany/*/ Please ask nautilus maintainer to make nautilus own %{_libdir}/epiphany/%{ephy_major}/extensions before doing such a thing ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088#c25 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469491 > > > The problem is: If epiphany gets updated from 2.22 to 2.23 the three > > > directories will become unowned. > > > > What do I need to do? Just the rebuilds you mention below? > > With the line you are using now you would need to do a rebuild a rebuild in > time with epiphany, but _after_ it has been pushed out, because you are > building against it. This should only happen on rawhide, no problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
