Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #29 from D Haley <my...@yahoo.com> 2009-01-22 06:09:42 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-9.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-0.5.1-9.fc10.src.rpm Scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1073687 $ rpmlint flexdock.spec ../RPMS/i386/flexdock-0.5.1-9.fc10.i386.rpm ../SRPMS/flexdock-0.5.1-9.fc10.src.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. >There's still trailing whitespace in the following lines I re-ran the whitespace removal through vim. What is so bad about trailing whitespace anyway - provided it isn't multi-kilobyte? >mkdir -p %{buildroot}/usr/share Gone. >Why don't you just modify the patch? Because of lib64 vs lib. >-d2u It forces dos to unix conversion mode. I now just use sed instead, its neater and is one less require. >Couldn't you just patch the build system not to put arch in lib filename? The way they do this, from memory is a bit odd. Patching would require more work than simply locating the SOFILE -- locating the SOFILE is easier and the project is not changing that much, and the SOFILE name wont change a lot, so it is maintainable. Either way the end result is the same -- we locate the SOFILE. Using find is marginally slower, but I am not writing my spec files for speed. >strip --strip-unneeded $SOFILE Calling strip is not allowed because you need the debugging symbols, however calling strip-unneeded does not intefere with the debugging symbols. However to make it neater I have changed this (see next item) > Actually it's simple. Just don't chmod the .so to 644. It has to be executable > for rpmbuild debuginfo scripts to find it. rpmlint is silent afterwards. Done. >Manually making symlinks is fragile, especially for versioned JARs. Versioned jars were not being symlinked, although named ones were. The version number is to satisfy the flexdock buildsys. I have switched it to using build-jar-repository, but I feel that the new method is less straightforward, and more likely to break. I personally think the new method is more obscure. >These are not needed, as the library is not in ld.so search path (and not directly linkable). Dropped post/postun >I suggest using a case statement here. It'll be easy to add other arches later. >For example sparc64. Done. > Changelog entries must have a space between * and date. Done. >Why do you need a specific libX11 version? Gone. I cant seem to track down any reason for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review