Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl <cw...@alumni.drew.edu> 2009-04-13 22:17:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - summary matches upstream, but is poor English. Should be > "A serialization framework for Moose classes" (not "An...") Ugh. Thanks :) > Minor niggle with the summary. And you need to filter the provides: > perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::DoNotSerialize) = 0.17 > perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::Trait::DoNotSerialize) = 0.17 Hm. Why would we need to filter these? They're valid packages, even if Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::Trait::DoNotSerialize is in lib/MooseX/Storage/Meta/Attribute/Trait/DoNotSerialize.pm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
