Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl <cw...@alumni.drew.edu> 2009-04-16 00:55:49 EDT --- (sorry this is taking so long; $work has its way of interfering... :)) Hrm. Well, I think that's a pretty reasonable approach. I tend to use "is it filtered in META.yml or otherwise hidden from the CPAN indexer", but TMTOWTDI :) In this case, that's a stub class that Moose uses to help do name resolution on traits. It's made available when the owning file is use'd, and could reasonably be looked for if we ever get the autoreq handling Moose-y bits. We also have precedent for this, in that, e.g. perl-RPC-XML does the same sort of thing (multiple packages in one .pm) and perl-App-Asciio does it in reverse (multiple .pm's for a single class). I guess the heart of the question is: are perl(*) provides file or package based? I'd say it's package based, given the way autoprov currently works, but it does seem ripe for discussion... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
