Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #14 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pa...@hubbitus.info> 2009-07-20 18:45:45 EDT --- My 2 cent in embed/shared minilzo discussion. A also want see all libraries in system only in 1 exemplar (where it is possible off course) to have slender system where all on self places. And, one small note: (In reply to comment #10) > Even if I also don't like the large patch to use the external (mini)lzo > library, I still think it is the correct way: About what large patch you are speaking? There few string cuts, and size only to file deletion. I can delete it in spec by 1 command... or even this is not necessary! So I only ask: It there any real advantages to use static build? Speed? Size? For what we should try change existing guidelines? Why shared linking should be with full lzo, not minimalistic minilzo, if it is enough? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
