Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #22 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pa...@hubbitus.info> 2009-07-21 16:48:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20)> > This is bug #439979. The shared-minilzo patch there has broken > --use-system-libvncserver. I'll look to it. My patch to cut off minilzo from x11vnc work as expected I think. > E.g. one guideline kills the other. > If one argues that one needs a shared (mini)lzo, then one needs to continue > the > logic and require a shared libvncserver. About what you speaking? What argues to what? I say what *both* library should be used as shared system libraries, and at this time work to do that (for libvncserver now). > (In reply to comment #18) > About a million thanks! And the same applies to libvncserver (actually most of > the lzo calls are in the libvncserver part, if not all). So maybe you want to > fix libvncserver first? As I say, off course I'll try do it. > Just for testing, you can build a static-minilzo libvncserver and see whether > --use-system-libvncserver works, and whether there is any minilzo code used > directly anymore by x11vnc. If not, then this part of the review is done and > the shared-lzo patch would need to move completely to libvncserver. In my patch to cutoff minilzo I compleately remove even files of it from sources before start process. So, it can be linked only with system (mini)lzo library. But now, as I want link it with system libvncserver it have not many sense... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
