Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #61 from Axel Thimm <axel.th...@atrpms.net> 2009-08-28 08:14:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #60) > 1. The java client doesn't build out of the box just by by the global "make". > There are some manual steps necessary. Well, can't these manual steps be written in a specfile? > 2. On the other hand, I was under the expression that we don't want to ship > the > clients at all. Whether the java applet is desired or not is a different question depending on its usefulness (the license question has already been checked). What is rather certain and would require an exception by the FPC otherwise is that if there are any java bits to be packaged they have to have been built by the package. So, it's either a) Rebuild the java support and the first step would be to remove the existing targets and add build support to the specfile or the upstream Makefile(s), or b) don't add any java support, but you don't need to actually delete them during the build if they are not used in packaging, removing the folders from the main Makefile is enough (like in a diff further up the report). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
