Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #62 from Christian Krause <c...@plauener.de> 2009-08-28 08:29:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #61) > Whether the java applet is desired or not is a different question depending on > its usefulness (the license question has already been checked). What is rather > certain and would require an exception by the FPC otherwise is that if there > are any java bits to be packaged they have to have been built by the package. I fully agree. It is up to the packager whether we wants to add the java client or not. I'm fine with either way. > So, it's either > > a) Rebuild the java support and the first step would be to remove the existing > targets and add build support to the specfile or the upstream Makefile(s), or Yes. > b) don't add any java support, but you don't need to actually delete them > during the build if they are not used in packaging, removing the folders from > the main Makefile is enough (like in a diff further up the report). I agree that this may be debatable. Personally think explicit deleting of the pre-built binaries in spec file in the %prep section will make it quite obvious for anyone who looks at the spec file later, that there is an issue with pre-built binaries which must be kept in mind. That's all. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
