Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sparse - source code semantec parser used by the Linux kernel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212513 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-30 23:44 EST ------- re: tarballs - doesn't honestly matter to me if the package has a daily snapshot tarball or a git clone'd tarball from a given day. I can put a comment in that snapshot tarballs are also available at DaveJ's site, or can use his tarballs directly, either way. re: git in the alphatag, that's a figment of git clone method above and Packaging/NamingGuidelines says to use it. I suppose if I used one of the snapshot tarballs, that could be dropped, though NamingGuidelines doesn't really cover this scenario exactly (a non-project-released snapshot tarball). Spot? Thanks for the additional review and comments. Package builds and works on x86_64 for me too btw; I haven't tried ppc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
