On Apr 18, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Paavo Kakko wrote:

> On 18.4.2012 14:30, John Buttimer wrote:
>> One thing they should look at is sales of books after an adaptation.
>> How many people went out and bought the HP books (multiples, since many may 
>> have bought the first and not liked it after that) and the LOTR ones versus 
>> say goodkinds series after his tv adaptation. Then figure out if a complete 
>> rewrite is better or if they should stay closer to the source material.
>> 
> 
> Trying to view this from the production company's point of view. Why should 
> the production company doing the feature/show care how much books people buy 
> afterwards? It doesn't make money for them. They don't make the feature/show 
> so the author can profit. That doesn't mean that they don't want to make it 
> entertaining and popular. If they think that is best served by straying from 
> the source material, so be it.
> 
> One thing that's been sort of neglected so far in this discussion is that the 
> people in production companies who hold the purse strings, while certainly 
> savvy in the business sense and have to have some aptitude for storytelling 
> and seeing the story visually in a way it can be made, are rarely as talented 
> as the people they employ to create the feature/show. And they have to make 
> decisions that make sense for the studio. I know I would be more than a bit 
> cautious about okaying a budget worth a few hundred million dollars and 
> possibly getting no more work in the industry, if I didn't have good reasons 
> for how I thought the finished work would turn out good and make money, in 
> the case it didn't. So they tend to bet towards the things that have been 
> proven sound.


It's hard (and probably wrong) to generalize.  It's not like every money guy is 
bereft of artistic sensibilities, or that every production guy has a clue.

There are a lot of smart people in film/TV.  And as I said, no one ever 
intentionally sets out to make a bad show/film.

Best, R.E.F.
----
www.crydee.com

Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by 
stupidity.







Reply via email to