Indeed the event dispatching is distributed.
o.k., I see.
That is because I said that the specification seems to me a bit elusive referring to UPnP Events ... Moreover this could be a valid reason to adopt an external bundle that bridge all the UPnP Events to the EA service ... it works also without the base driver ....
Hm, the problem I see with this is how do you know that a device that reads the spec differently doesn't send its events to the event admin too? Then we end-up with a situation where we have duplicated events. This sounds like a tough problem. If we provide an external bridge then we could create duplicated events - If we don't then for some events no bridging is taking place ... either way we lose :-( Maybe we should raise this issue on the osgi-dev list and request some clarifications on who is supposed to do what exactly?! Additionally, rather then creating a separate bundle, I'd propose to include the bridge in the EventAdmin instead. It already does some other bridging anyways (i.e., Framework-, Bundle-,Service-, and Log-Events). Does this sound like a good idea? regards, Karl -- Karl Pauls [EMAIL PROTECTED]
