> O.k., let me propose the following, I integrate the bridge in the EA > and make it a configurable option.
> Additionally, I will ask at the osgi-dev list > whether there is any better approach we didn't see. > > Opinions?
excellent for me, it goes in the direction to simplify the coding for the developers too.
-- snip ---
But It seems me that moving the dispatching to the EA service is a more simple approach, consider that the UPnP Tester bundle already works in this way, and the cost to register a general UPnPEventLister is negligible in comparison to the "litterally" solution when we consider the complication we avoid to the developers.
O.k., I'll assign the JIRA to me then an resolve it as soon as I find some time.
We have absolutely receive an official clarification from OSGi otherwise we risk to have two different solutions to the problem.
By making it an optional feature of the EA we at least don't make a mistake. Once I resolved the JIRA I'm going to ask at osgi-dev.
One more thing, the Tester bundle if you like could be user in more general way to monitor not only UPnP Events but also the state of the EA Service .... just a thought on which we can return to discuss ...;-)
Yeah, that's a good idea. That way we could add something like a warning if events are not bridged and hint the user to enable the bridging in the EA.
Francesco
regards, Karl -- Karl Pauls [EMAIL PROTECTED]
