On Monday 29 May 2006 14:31, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > On Friday 26 May 2006 20:55, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> >> I was wondering if it would be better to have:
> >>
> >> * pom.groupId = "org.apache.felix"
> >> * pom.artifactId = "scr"
> >>
> >> Thus, the symbolic name would be:
> >>
> >> * ${pom.groupId} + "." + ${pom.artifactId}
> >
> > So, the symbolic name == the concatenated group.artifact... How about the
> > Jar file name?? Is that getting the symbolic name + version ??
>
> Personally, I would rather have it be artifactId + version because the
> JAR filenames are way too long currently.
And you don't see a problem with "scr-1.0.0.jar" ending up in potential naming
conflict??
Personally, I have little preference. Eclipse uses FQDN_version.jar, and there
seems to be some reason behind that.
Cheers
Niclas
