[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 02:20:36PM +0100, Upayavira wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 01 September 2006 16:58, santillan wrote:
Just a note: while JMood's initial version was LGPL'd, a software grant was
given to the ASF and the JMood code in the trunk is properly ASL'd.
Moreover, I've removed the dependency to MX4J just in case (as it was easy
to refactor), so currently only depends on osgi.core, osgi.compendium, the
framework and Junit, so no licensing problems here :-)
Cool. So we are discussing a hypothetical case ;o)
Well, the issue that remains is how we use jfree and jcommon, both of
which are, as I understand it, Jmood dependencies, and both are LGPL.
Not Jmood, but MOSGi dependencies.
Yes, people seemed to have gotten lost. :-)
Well, the way I see it, if we cannot find compatible graphing libraries,
then we can either remove the component and Stephane can host it
separately (perhaps at Source Forge) or we can create some sort of
bridging and make it optional somehow. Stephane probably knows what
makes the most sense.
-> richard
