Not sure I agree with that view personally:
CPL is definitely a license which includes source use - it's our base
license for open source work.
Also, would be rather odd if they didn't allow source use since I was
under impression that both are on the list of approved open source licenses:
http://opensource.org/
But then IA-D-NAL .... D = definitely!
- R
Richard S. Hall wrote:
By the looks of it from this link:
http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
Both MPL and CPL are binary only licenses. So, we cannot include the
source in our releases, but can include binaries...if I understand it
correctly.
-> richard
Manuel Santillan wrote:
Hi all,
IANAL, o I'm a bit confused about licenses. Is it possible to commit
code that depends on MPL'd code(Mozilla license)? What about
dependencies on CPL'd code?
Thanx!!
//manuel
--
Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+44 (0)20 7488 3470
www.ascert.com
