Sorry guys - just read into that and can see that now.
Apologies for missing the point on this one
- R
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Thursday 07 September 2006 22:14, Rob Walker wrote:
Not sure I agree with that view personally:
CPL is definitely a license which includes source use - it's our base
license for open source work.
It is related to the restrictions placed on downstream users. IIRC (too lazy
to check) CPL had some "contribute back" or "notification" requirements that
are not ASL compatible. Cliff's list has been discussed plenty over at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers
Niclas
--
Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+44 (0)20 7488 3470
www.ascert.com
